Which costs your business more – workers who miss work or ones who show up physically but take a mental PTO day?
For most corporations, it’s the latter. So why do even savvy upper managers and finance directors (we’re not just talking about the bean-counters) worry about absenteeism while downplaying so-called presenteeism as a drain on business productivity, not to mention the compensation and benefits budget?
In some cases, senior managers seem to think that admitting that presenteeism even exists at the firm is akin to saying, “We are a poorly run company.” In reality, presenteeism exists in every workplace.
Virtually every employee, manager, supervisor and executive who has ever tried to “tough it out” at work when he or she’s been sick has been a presentee on those days.
So has anyone who’s ever been distracted at work by non-work issues – whether it’s spending the day trying to resolve an individual financial matter, checking on a sick child at home or constantly checking for scoring updates from a sporting event.
In brief, unless we’re to believe that every staff member is productive every single day, no business in the world is immune from presenteeism.
Some corporations that don’t bury their heads in the sand about presenteeism still don’t track it. Why? Typically, there’s a belief that chronic presentees eventually get rooted out of the company.
And short of watching over every other employee’s shoulder throughout the workday, it’s too challenging (and even counterproductive) to attempt to estimate the cost to the corporation.
Here are some strategies that firms have used to not only measure the cost but also reduce the problem.
Creating a cost estimate
If your corporation is like most, senior management worries endlessly about health benefit costs without realizing undetected presenteeism is just as costly, but easier to control.
Consider these facts from a recent CSG study – Almost 10 percent of the typical annually pay and benefits
budget is spent on non-productive (but treatable) workers.
Add in employees who call out at the last second and the percentage rises to 17%, according to SHRM.
But how do you estimate the actual dollars-and-cents cost to your firm?
Let’s assume you have 50 personnel, who make an average $40,000 a year. Over the while the year, the average worker is non-productive 2.5 percent of the time, because of assorted personal issues or minor diseases that serve as distractions.
In this instance, presenteeism costs your business $50,000 a year. If you’ve a 5% presenteeism rate, the figure shoots up to $100,000.
While it’s impossible to entirely stamp out presenteeism, even small reductions in presenteeism add up to big bucks in controlling compensation and benefit costs.
The next step, of course, is doing something about the issue. Broadly speaking, the process ordinarily works in three phases –
review current policies and procedures for things that accidentally increase presenteeism
get supervisors and staff members involved on the front end, and
stress the importance of work-life programs to upper management and supervisors.
Let’s look at each area to see how they work in real-life practice.
Unintentional effects
Three common ways many firms try to cut absenteeism often increase presenteeism –
1. Over-stressing attendance in employee’s annual reviews
2. Having supervisors check up on employees who take sick days to verify they are really ill, and/or
3. Disciplining personnel for last-moment sick callouts.
From a practical and cost standpoint, the best solution may be to switch from separate vacation and sick-day benefits to a single paid time off (PTO) bank.
When folks have no-questions-asked control over their off days, they’re sometimes more likely to use a PTO day when they’re sick. Of course, you know that PTO carries some risks of its own.
Early detection
Fewer than one business in 10 gets both managers and staff members involved in the process of spotting and eliminating presenteeism.
That’s too bad, says advisor Mary Beth Chalk, because it can been done pretty easily.
Ask a sampling of employees to rate how energetic and productive they ordinarily feel at work, on a percentage scale. Have supervisors estimate their staff as well. Then split the difference.
The result is a pretty good barometer of your organization’s current and future presenteeism risk.
Work-life balance
Anything you can do to promote work-life programs at your firm can have a positive effect on the bottom line. Proven ideas include –
rewarding supervisors who support flexible work arrangements
sending sick personnel home
cover onsite flu shots, and
Actively promote your existing Staff Member Assistance Program.